Name: What Happens If You Destroy A Black Hole?
Uploaded: 2024-07-01T06:16:06.000Z
Duration: 10 min 53 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

Black holes can destroy everything, but can they be destroyed?

What happens if we push physics to the absolute limit, maybe even breaking it and the universe in the process?

Let's create a tiny black hole about the mass of our moon in the Kurzgesagt labs and try to rip it apart.

Big booms break things, so to set the mood, let's explode the world's entire nuclear arsenal around our black hole.

Black holes swallow whatever crosses their event horizon, matter and energy.

And since E equals mc squared, all the energy that enters a black hole increases its mass.

The mass of a black hole is proportional to its size, so as we nuke our tiny black hole, it just gets bigger and more massive.

Matter and antimatter annihilate each other.

What will happen if we throw a moon's mass of antimatter at it?

Unfortunately, when an object enters a black hole, the black hole will completely delete its past identity, whether it's made of matter or of antimatter.

Black holes only care about gravity, which only depends on the total mass-energy of an object.

And the mass of a particle is the same as its corresponding antiparticle, so throwing an antimoon has the same effect as throwing a moon.

This deleting ability of black holes is pretty interesting.

It means that despite their size and power, black holes are, in a way, similar to elementary particles.

An elementary particle, like an electron, is an extremely simple object, fully specified by just three numbers, its mass, spin, and charge.

And, amazingly, the same is true for black holes.

They have a mass, they can rotate, and carry an electric charge.

Once a black hole forms, it doesn't matter if it comes from a collapsed star, an antistar, or a banana, it will always be fully described by those three numbers, nothing else.

But if a black hole is basically a weird particle, could we destroy it with an anti-black hole?

A particle has the same mass as its corresponding antiparticle, but opposite charge.

Since a black hole has mass and electric charge, its corresponding anti-black hole should have the same mass and opposite electric charge.

Sadly, the charge will just add up and cancel out.

So, after the collision, we'll just get a new black hole twice as massive with no charge.

Okay, we need to think bigger, and stretch physics harder.

It's true that a black hole can carry spin and charge, but even for these crazy objects, there are limits.

If the spin or the charge of a black hole becomes too large, something really weird will happen.

In a simplified way, we think of black holes as hiding a singularity inside, an infinitely compressed mass with such strong gravity that absolutely nothing can escape from its surroundings, not even light.

This is why a black hole looks like a black sphere of nothingness.

The event horizon is the outer edge of this ultimate prison.

Cross it, and you'll never be able to come back.

But when a black hole rotates, it works a bit like a spinning washing machine.

It's as if the rotation wants to repel nearby objects and push them out of the black hole, which doesn't happen because its gravity is so strong.

But, if the rotation gets too fast, this effect will win, and the event horizon will disappear.

Nearby objects won't be imprisoned forever anymore.

The same thing happens with the electric charge.

Make it too large, and our ironclad jail will break open.

If we manage to destroy the event horizon, the singularity would still be there, and objects would still naturally fall towards it.

If you hit it, you would still die horribly and quickly.

But the vicinity of the singularity won't be an inescapable prison anymore.

You could get as close as you want and come back.

This should count as destroying the black hole.

All we have to do is to overcharge or overspin the black hole.

We could do this by throwing objects with a small mass and a lot of charge or angular momentum so that the charge or spin increases faster than the mass.

We have to overfeed the black hole until it reaches the point where it breaks open.

However, whether you can actually do this is the subject of passionate argument among physicists.

Equal charges repel each other, and the more of the same charges you squish together, the more they push back.

So let's say that we have a negatively charged black hole and we want to overfeed it with electrons, for example, whose charge is far larger than its mass.

The electrons will feel an electrostatic repulsion, and the more electrons we throw, the larger the negative charge of the black hole will be and the stronger the repulsion.

But once we reach the upper limit, the electrostatic repulsion will be so strong that it won't allow any more electrons to come in.

At this point, the black hole will refuse to be overfed.

Once the black hole reaches its upper limit, it won't gobble more spin.

But some scientists have discovered what looks like a loophole.

If an instant before the black hole reaches the limit, we throw the right amount of matter in in just the right way, it looks like we could actually overfeed it.

Most scientists are skeptical, but let's give it a try anyway.

The event horizon of a black hole hides the singularity.

So destroying the horizon would leave us with a naked singularity, one that is not hidden by an event horizon.

It could mean the end of physics as we know it.

There's a big dirty secret about black holes.

Contrary to widespread belief, the singularity of a black hole is not really at its center.

No, it's in the future of whatever crosses the horizon.

Black holes warp the universe so drastically that at the event horizon, space and time switch their roles.

Once you cross it, falling towards the center means going towards the future.

Stopping your fall and turning back would be just as impossible as stopping time and traveling to the past.

So the singularity is actually in your future, not in front of you.

And just like you can't see your own future, you won't see the singularity until you hit it.

But you also can't hit something that's in your future, only sort of experience it, like you'll experience your next birthday when it happens.

Singularities that are in the future are not a problem because we can't see them or interact with them.

But a naked singularity would be in front of us for all of us to see.

Well, the whole point is that it's impossible to know.

A singularity is a region of infinite gravity, and gravity is the bending of space-time.

At a singularity, the bending is so radical that the fabric of space-time is literally broken.

This means that you can't predict anything, since predicting means making a forecast about where and when something will happen.

But where and when have lost their meaning.

So we have an unpredictable thing with infinite gravity and therefore infinite energy.

This means that anything could come out of it for no reason, from a pile of bananas to lost socks or a solar system.

Predictability, causality, and physics as we know it would break down.

We think that singularities should exist in nature because we can prove that under very general conditions, gravitational collapse leads to the formation of singularities.

However, scientists think that nature forbids the formation of naked singularities.

Something enforces the creation of an event horizon around them to prevent their insanity from infecting the rest of the universe.

Without event horizons, physics may not make sense at all.